![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Danbury,CT
Posts: 65
|
A quick question: I got Tucker from a breeder and I knew that his dew claws were removed. However one of the claws was not removed fully and has grown back a tad bit. I am to understand this is a normal practice with breeders but my boyfriend seems to think that maybe we got Tucker from a bad breeder because of his dew claws being removed. So what is everyone's perspective on dew claws and their removal? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Destin, FL (USA)
Posts: 2,799
|
Pooh Bear has one dew claw that is still partically there. Our vet said not to worry about it. It doesn't bother him.
Sadie's breeder didn't have her dew claws removed. We never did get them removed. They get really sharp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,239
|
Many breeders will have them removed. You take them in at a few days old and it's a very easy procedure. Much more intensive when they are older.
Duke and Violet both have theirs, but Duke even has back dew claws. I really have to watch that they don't get too long and he hates having them clipped.
__________________
Owned by Duke (beagle-2), Violet (beagle-2), Cassie (lab-13) and Phoebe (kitty-3). |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Either way with or without it doesn't bother the dog, it just helps so that they dont snag on things.
__________________
Sephly! http://www.dogster.com/dogs/964211 <dogster http://destinationofprocrastination.blogspot.com/ <blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 1,163
|
As a breeder myself, I always have the dewclaws removed. The expense is minimal as a pup because no sedatives are necessary and as mentioned previously it is not fully developed. Some dogs have front and back dewclaws, but I have yet to see that in any of the beagles that have come through our home. The main reason to have them removed is because of the location of them. Since they do not meet the ground (and can't file themselves naturally) they are often forgotten and can grow to the point that they grow back into the dog's leg requiring surgery to repair. Also they grow so close to the leg it is hard to file or clip without risking injury to the dog. They serve no purpose to the dog unless the dog is to be used in hunting large animals. It helps the dog in treeing the animal and enables the dog to essentially hold onto the base of the tree. I hope that all makes sense.
__________________
Donna - owned by Maya, Little Man Tate, Sulli, and honorary beagle Sam |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|